What is the Difference Between a CFA and a DBA?
For those engaged in legal proceedings within the England and Wales, the financial implications of litigation are a significant consideration. Alternatives to traditional fee structures, such as Conditional Fee Agreements (CFAs) and Damages-Based Agreements (DBAs), offer potential avenues for managing these costs. While both aim to mitigate the financial risk for the litigant, their operational mechanisms differ substantially.
“Legal funding arrangements should empower clients, not burden them. Whether a CFA or DBA is right for you depends on your specific circumstances and risk tolerance. We’re here to ensure you understand all options available to you.”
Satish Jakhu, Director and Head of Litigation Department
Conditional Fee Agreements (CFAs)
A CFA, commonly known as a “no win, no fee” agreement, links your solicitor’s payment directly to the outcome of your case. This arrangement was designed to improve access to justice for those who might otherwise be unable to afford legal representation. Under this model, the solicitor shares some of the risk of litigation with you. The main points are:
- You pay no legal fees, or reduced fees, if your case is unsuccessful
- If you win, you pay the solicitor’s basic fees plus a “success fee”
- The success fee is capped at 100% of the basic fees
- Success fees cannot be recovered from the losing party
Damages-Based Agreements (DBAs)
With a DBA, your solicitor receives a percentage of the compensation you’re awarded rather than charging based on time spent on your case. This relatively newer funding option in the England and Wales legal system creates a direct link between what you recover and what your solicitor earns, potentially aligning interests more closely. DBAs can be particularly attractive in cases where the potential damages are substantial and reasonably certain.
- Your solicitor takes an agreed percentage of your damages if you win
- If you lose, you typically don’t pay solicitor fees
- The percentage is capped by law
- This fee typically includes VAT and barrister costs
- As with CFAs, you may still be liable for other costs if unsuccessful
“DBAs provide clarity from the outset about what you’ll pay if successful. For many clients, knowing exactly what percentage of their compensation will go towards legal fees offers valuable peace of mind during an already stressful process.”
Chris Guy, Director and Head of Insurance Litigation
Key Differences to Consider
The main distinction lies in how your solicitor calculates their fees, but this fundamental difference creates several important practical implications for clients. Understanding these nuances can help you make a more informed choice about which funding arrangement better suits your specific situation and comfort level with different types of financial risk.
- CFAs base fees on the solicitor’s time plus a success fee
- DBAs take a straightforward percentage of your compensation
- DBAs offer more predictability in high-value cases
- CFAs might be better suited for cases with uncertain values or non-monetary outcomes
Which Option Is Right for You?
Your choice between a CFA and DBA should be made carefully after thorough consideration of both your personal circumstances and the nature of your legal matter. Each option has distinct advantages and potential drawbacks depending on various factors specific to your case. A conversation with an experienced solicitor can help clarify which approach aligns better with your goals and financial situation.
- The estimated value of your claim
- Case complexity and expected timeframe
- Your personal financial situation
- Chances of success
“Every case is unique, and so is its optimal funding arrangement. What works perfectly for one client might be completely unsuitable for another. We always take time to explain the implications of each option before proceeding.”
Richard Cooper, Senior Associate Solicitor
If you’re considering legal action and need guidance on the most appropriate funding arrangement for your situation, contact RLK today. Our experienced team will help you navigate these options with clarity and confidence. Call us on 0121 450 7800 or email enquiries@rlksolicitors.com to discuss your case.
Chris Guy is the Head of the Business Interruption Litigation department and has recently been made a Director. Chris is primarily from an insurance based civil litigation background, having trained at Legal 500 firm Berrymans Lace Mawer (now Clyde & Co).
Chris has an astute commercial mindset, having worked within the legal team at a major insurer and was previously seconded to assist in-house with FTSE 250 companies and international insurers. Chris was listed in the Legal 500 for his civil litigation expertise. Chris assists clients with his attention to detail, commitment and user-friendly service.
