When business relationships become strained and disputes arise, traditional litigation isn’t always the most effective route to resolution. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods like mediation and arbitration offer businesses more flexible, private, and often more cost-effective ways to resolve conflicts. Understanding these options can help you make informed decisions about the best approach for your specific situation.
Business disputes that end up in court can be lengthy, expensive, and potentially damaging to important commercial relationships. Court proceedings are also public, meaning sensitive business information may become accessible to competitors or the media. For these reasons, many businesses are increasingly turning to alternative methods of dispute resolution.
The primary benefits of ADR include:
Mediation is a voluntary, non-binding process where a neutral third party – the mediator – helps the disputing parties reach their own negotiated settlement. Unlike a judge or arbitrator, the mediator has no power to impose a decision on the parties.
Mediation is particularly effective for disputes where ongoing business relationships are important or where the parties would benefit from creative solutions that courts might not be able to order. It puts the parties in control of the outcome rather than leaving the decision to a third party.
Mediation is often most successful in situations where:
While mediation has a high success rate (approximately 85% of commercial mediations result in settlement), it’s not suitable for every dispute. In cases where there’s a significant power imbalance between parties or where establishing a legal precedent is important, other methods may be more appropriate.
Arbitration is a more formal alternative to litigation where an independent arbitrator (or panel of arbitrators) makes a binding decision on the dispute. Think of arbitration as a private court system where the parties have greater control over the procedural rules and choice of decision-maker.
Unlike mediation, arbitration results in a decision imposed on the parties. However, it still offers significant advantages over litigation, including greater confidentiality, procedural flexibility, and the ability to select decision-makers with relevant expertise.
Arbitration is particularly well-suited to:
For more detailed insights on how arbitration compares to commercial litigation, see our in-depth analysis: Arbitration vs Commercial Litigation
When deciding which ADR method might be best for your business dispute, consider these key differences:
| Aspect | Mediation | Arbitration |
| Who controls the outcome | The parties themselves | The arbitrator |
| Binding nature | Only if settlement is reached | Automatically binding |
| Formality | Generally informal | More formal, similar to court |
| Focus | Finding mutual agreement | Determining who is right |
| Timing | Can be arranged quickly | Usually takes longer than mediation |
| Cost | Generally less expensive | More expensive but usually less than court |
| Relationship impact | Often preserves relationships | More adversarial |
In many cases, these methods can be used sequentially – starting with mediation and proceeding to arbitration only if settlement isn’t reached. This “med-arb” approach combines the benefits of both processes.
The best time to consider ADR is before any dispute occurs. Consider these preventative measures:
If you’re already in a dispute:
“The right dispute resolution method should align with your commercial goals. Sometimes winning a legal battle but losing a valuable business relationship is a pyrrhic victory. We help clients consider all aspects of their dispute to find the most strategically advantageous approach.”
Satish Jakhu, Director and Head of Litigation Department
At RLK Solicitors, our litigation team has extensive experience in both traditional court proceedings and alternative dispute resolution methods. We can help you:
Our approach focuses on finding the most commercially sensible path to resolution, keeping your business objectives at the center of our strategy. We believe in pragmatic solutions that protect your interests while minimising disruption to your business operations.
If you’re facing a business dispute and want to explore mediation or arbitration options, contact RLK Solicitors for expert guidance. Our experienced litigation team can help you navigate these processes effectively, protecting your commercial interests while seeking efficient resolution.
Call us on 0121 450 7800 or email enquiries@rlksolicitors.com to arrange a consultation.
Richard is a highly experienced litigator with over 20 years' experience across Corporate & Commercial Litigation. Richard has held senior roles in firms such as Knights, Emms Gilmore Liberson where he was Head of Commercial Litigation. Syndney Mitchell, Gateley Plc and Bell Lax Solicitors.
Stay up to date with all our latest news.
We combine creative thinking with an unshakable commitment to your success. We focus our efforts on you.
RLK Solicitors Ltd is registered in England and Wales under company number 7189629 and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors. Regulation Authority under SRA number 522998.
