Solicitors with GRIT.
The High Court’s ruling against PPE Medpro, the company linked to Baroness Michelle Mone, marks a turning point in pandemic contract enforcement. The £122 million repayment order reshapes PPE contract litigation and what UK businesses must do to protect themselves.
Crucially, the repayment deadline of 15 October 2025 has now passed without payment. With interest added, the total debt has swelled to approximately £145 million.
This case is more than a contract dispute, it is a litmus test for government accountability and corporate responsibility in the aftermath of COVID-19.
The ruling centred on PPE Medpro’s supply of surgical gowns during the pandemic, which were deemed unfit for use within the NHS. Although the gowns bore CE marks, they lacked sufficient quality assurance and failed sterility requirements, meaning they never complied with the procurement contract.
The case highlights how UK courts will not excuse breaches of contract, even in the exceptional circumstances of a global health emergency.
Key Legal Findings in the PPE Medpro Case
Non-compliance is not excused by urgency
Emergency procurement rules did not protect PPE Medpro from liability.
CE marking alone is insufficient
The courts scrutinised whether certification was genuinely valid, not just present on packaging.
Judgment does not guarantee recovery
While the court awarded damages, reports suggest PPE Medpro may have limited remaining assets, raising complex enforcement issues.
Directors and beneficiaries under scrutiny
With assets frozen and personal connections under investigation, the case may test the boundaries of personal liability in UK procurement disputes.
Why This Case Matters Beyond PPE Contracts
Although PPE Medpro was a supply contract dispute, the implications extend into PPE loan litigation and wider government repayment demands. Across England and Wales, businesses who took pandemic related loans or entered emergency contracts may now face:
Repayment demands from government departments.
Contract enforcement actions where goods or services fell short
Civil litigation in London and regional High Courts
Insolvency proceedings where repayment is contested
Reputational fallout in the media and political sphere
This case is a stark reminder that UK businesses must be prepared to defend against complex, high-value claims.
The Rise of PPE Contract Litigation in the UK
Following the pandemic, the UK government has increasingly sought to recover public money allocated under emergency schemes. This has led to a sharp rise in PPE contract litigation.
Common issues include:
Contracts advanced under pandemic schemes now being challenged as misapplied
Suppliers accused of failing to meet quality standards or contractual obligations
Disputes over payment terms, refunds, and penalties
Investigations into whether directors should face personal liability for losses
With cases being heard across England and Wales, and many funnelling into the High Court in London, businesses need expert representation from solicitors who understand the legal, regulatory, and political dimensions of such claims.
Risks Facing UK Businesses and Directors
The legal and financial risks of PPE contracts litigation in the UK include:
Enforcement measures, freezing orders, winding-up petitions, or bankruptcy proceedings
Cross-border asset tracing where funds or property have been moved offshore
Disqualification proceedings under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986
Personal liability exposure if directors are found to have acted dishonestly or negligently
The message from the Medpro case is clear: UK authorities are prepared to pursue repayment aggressively, and businesses cannot rely on procedural leniency.
How RLK Solicitors Can Help in PPE Contract Litigation
At RLK Solicitors, we have defended cases identical to this and specialise in high-value commercial litigation, procurement disputes, and PPE contract defence. Our team has acted for clients across England and Wales, giving us a deep understanding of how the UK courts approach pandemic-related claims.
We provide:
Strategic defence representation, challenging repayment demands and litigation claims
Contractual analysis, identifying weaknesses in government claims
Enforcement strategy, protecting client assets and resisting recovery proceedings
Reputation management, advising on the public and media dimensions of disputes
Negotiation and settlement expertise, resolving matters before they escalate in court
RLK Solicitors acts nationally, with the capacity to represent clients both in regional courts and before specialist divisions in London. Our UK-wide reach means we understand local business pressures, while also offering the sophistication needed for complex, multi-jurisdictional disputes.
What Businesses Should Do Now
If you are facing a potential claim or have already been served with proceedings relating to a PPE government contract, you should act immediately:
Do not ignore correspondence, Government departments will escalate quickly.
Preserve evidence, keep all contracts, certifications, delivery records, and communications.
Assess your risk, work with experienced solicitors to calculate exposure and identify potential defences.
Consider negotiation early, many disputes can be resolved through structured settlement.
Protect directors, ensure personal liability risks are understood and mitigated.
Why Choose RLK Solicitors?
Choosing the right legal partner is critical when facing PPE contract litigation. With extensive experience in high-value disputes, RLK Solicitors provide the reassurance and expertise you need.
Trusted across the UK for complex commercial litigation
Experience in procurement disputes, insolvency, and asset protection
Dedicated to protecting directors and businesses from reputational and financial harm
Proven results in resolving government contract disputes
Act Now to Protect Your Business
The PPE Medpro judgment is more than just a political headline, it is a clear signal that UK courts will rigorously enforce pandemic contract and procurement obligations. Businesses and directors who fail to prepare risk financial ruin, asset loss, and reputational damage.
At RLK Solicitors, we combine litigation expertise with strategic insight to defend our clients effectively. Whether you are a business facing PPE contract litigation, a director at risk of personal liability, or a company embroiled in a government contract dispute, we are here to help.
If you are facing litigation in respect of a PPE contract, contact RLK Solicitors today for a confidential consultation. Protect your business, your assets, and your reputation with expert legal support.
Stay up to date with all our latest news.
We combine creative thinking with an unshakable commitment to your success. We focus our efforts on you.
RLK Solicitors Ltd is registered in England and Wales under company number 7189629 and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors. Regulation Authority under SRA number 522998.
